海南师范大学学报(社会科学版)

资本的统治逻辑不仅支配着物质领域，同样也作用于精神领域。而记忆作为建构个体意识与集体认同的基石，自然成为资本权力试图干预和塑形的重要维度。将记忆置于资本主义治理术的理论视域考察，实质上是分析作为生命要素的记忆被纳入资本增殖与权力治理机制过程中的技术策略与运演逻辑。在工业资本主义时期，资本在物质生产中调整劳动的外延量（工作日）与劳动的内涵量（劳动强度）以征用个体记忆，并借助工厂制度将集体记忆转化为服务于生产效率的“组织记忆”。进入数字资本主义时期，记忆治理术进一步延伸至受资本支配的精神生产领域，经由数字“第三持存”数据化的个体记忆成为生产要素，注意力经济的布展则形成基于数字平台的“伪我们”集体记忆。据此，将超越资本主义记忆治理术的可能性置于历史唯物主义视域加以追问，明确资本主义记忆治理术的生成与变形根本上受生产方式、阶级结构与所有制形态所规制：在宏观层面，唯有彻底改变资本的增殖逻辑，克服记忆生产资料的私有制才能实现记忆权利的复归；在微观层面，通过推进慢速、深度且具身化的文化记忆实践重建主体的注意力与叙事主权，同样成为超越资本主义记忆治理术的有效途径。

The ruling logic of capital not only dominates the material realm, but also affects the spiritual realm. As the basis of individual consciousness and collective identification,memory naturally becomes a key dimension that capital seeks to intervene in and reshape. A survey of memory in the theoretical perspective of capitalist governmentality essentially involves analyzing the technical strategies and operational logic of incorporating memory, as a vital life element, into the process of capital expansion logic and power governance mechanisms. During industrial capitalism,capital adjusts the extensive magnitude of labor(the working day) and the intensive magnitude of labor(labor intensity)in material production to expropriate individual memory, and transforms collective memory into "organizational memory" serving production efficiency through the factory system. In the era of digital capitalism,memory governmentality has further extended into the realm of mental production dominated by capital,and individual memory,digitized through the digital "tertiary retention",has become a factor of production,while the deployment of the attention economy has given rise to a "pseudo-us" collective memory based on digital platforms. Therefore, an interrogation of the possibility of transcending capitalist memory governmentality in the perspective of historical materialism makes it clear that the generation and deformation of capitalist memory governmentality are fundamentally conditioned by the production mode,class structure and ownership form. At the macro level,only by thoroughly transforming the logic of capital accumulation and overcoming the private ownership of the means of memory production can the restoration of memory rights be achieved. At the micro level,the reconstruction of the subject's attention and narrative sovereignty through the cultivation of slow, deep, and embodied cultural memory practices also constitutes an effective path to transcend capitalist memory governmentality.